Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · CFR · Title 10 — Energy · Part 602 — Epidemiology and Other Health Studies Financial Assistance Program · § 602.9

§ 602.9. Application evaluation and selection.

479 words·~2 min read·/us/cfr/t10/s§ 602.9·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

(a)Applications shall be evaluated for funding generally within 6 months, but in any event no later than 12 months, from the date of receipt by DOE. After DOE has held an application for 6 months, the applicant may, in response to DOE's request, be required to revalidate the terms of the original application.
(b)DOE shall perform an initial evaluation of all applications to ensure that the information required by this part is provided, that the proposed effort is technically sound and feasible, and that the effort is consistent with program funding priorities. For applications that pass the initial evaluation, DOE shall review and evaluate each application received based on the criteria set forth below and in accordance with the Office of Environment, Health, Safety, and Security Merit Review System developed, as required, under DOE Financial Assistance Regulations, 2 CFR 200 as amended by 2 CFR 910.
(c)DOE shall select evaluators on the basis of their professional qualifications and expertise. To ensure credible and inclusive peer review of applications, every effort will be made to select evaluators apart from DOE employees and contractors. Evaluators shall be required to comply with all applicable DOE rules or directives concerning the use of outside evaluators.
(d)DOE shall evaluate new and renewal applications based on the following criteria that are listed in descending order of importance:
(1)The scientific and technical merit of the proposed research;
(2)The appropriateness of the proposed method or approach;
(3)Competency of research personnel and adequacy of proposed resources;
(4)Reasonableness and appropriateness of the proposed budget; and
(5)Other appropriate factors consistent with the purpose of this part established and set forth in a Notice of Availability or in a specific solicitation.
(e)DOE shall also consider as part of the evaluation other available advice or information, as well as program policy factors, such as ensuring an appropriate balance among the program areas listed in § 602.5 of this part.
(f)In addition to the evaluation criteria set forth in paragraphs
(d)and
(e)of this section, DOE shall consider the recipient's performance under the existing award during the evaluation of a renewal application.
(g)Selection of applications for award will be based upon the findings of the technical evaluations (including peer reviews, as specified in the Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security Merit Review System), the importance and relevance of the proposal to the Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security's mission, and the availability of funds. Cost reasonableness and realism will also be considered.
(h)After the selection of an application, DOE may, if necessary, enter into negotiations with an applicant. Such negotiations are not a commitment that DOE will make an award. [60 FR 5841, Jan. 31, 1995, as amended at 71 FR 68729, Nov. 28, 2006; 79 FR 76046, Dec. 19, 2014; 80 FR 5007, Jan. 30, 2015]
Connections4 cite this
2 references not yet in our index
  • 2 CFR 200
  • 2 CFR 910
Citation graph
cites case law
§ 602.9
Application evaluation and selection.
Fed. Reg.×4
Cite2 CFR 200
Cite2 CFR 910
Cites 2Cited by 4 across 1 source
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.